For the Task Order Construction Agreement (TOCA) project delivery method, the Agreement types are described in the following:
Campus will solicit proposals for the TOCA Master Enabling Agreement (MEA), under which Campus will issue a task order for preconstruction services, and then a Construction Agreement for the construction phase. Campus specifies the delivery method, either CMAR or CDB, to be used for the project in the task order and construction agreement. If Campus specifies in the task order that the TOCA project delivery is CDB, Campus issues a Phase 1 task order to the selected DB, for design and preconstruction services.
Upon satisfactory completion of Phase 1 services, Campus will issue the TO-CA Phase 2 construction phase CDB or CMR construction agreement. The agreement fees may be based on and Hourly Rate method (HR), or Percentage (PCT) method, depending on the RFP choice.
The Trustees Construction Phase Service Agreements may include the following: project manager; inspector of record, soils testing and materials testing laboratories; commissioning agent; MEP peer review services for CDB submittal reviews; hazardous materials testing; LEED certification documentation; and other project specific services. These construction phase services are provided under a service agreement between the Trustees and the service provider. Labor Code section 1720 requires payment of prevailing wage rates for contracted inspection, land surveying and related activities on public works construction projects. Public works registration with the DIR may be required.
Construction Administrator shall require the Project Architect to submit a list of testing that will be required with an estimate of the number and/or frequency of each type. The Project Architect is advised that requests for type and number of tests should be made in accordance with accepted code requirements. In order to have service agreements in place by start of construction, the Construction Administrator shall solicit and obtain proposals during the contractor's trade bid period, from which interested firms will submit proposals or letters. Using the Project Architect's estimate of tests required, the Construction Administrator then reviews the anticipated testing costs from the proposals submitted.
Trustees' policies in awarding a testing agreement are:
Selection of a testing lab is also based on:
Amendments or changes to service agreements are accomplished through the use of the same service agreement document, by identifying the amendment number at the top of the first page of the agreement. Typical reasons to issue an amendment are to establish new unit costs, make substantial changes to original quantities or scope, increase/decrease the contract amount, or adjust the term of the contract. Amendments should document actual services performed and also new services to be performed, so that encumbered funds are not expended against unauthorized services. Once the project is complete, and services for an agreement are no longer required, issue an amendment to credit the agreement, and disencumber the balance of the funds in the agreement.
Service Agreement Amendment Proposal Form: is used to identify the proposed change, the necessity, and will certify that funding is available. The originator of the request will sign the Recommendation for Approval, as will the Facility Planner and the Contracts Administrator, who will review the request to ensure that the change is within the following guidelines:
Amendment Approvals: There should be 4 levels of approval for the amendment proposal and the amendment, as is done with Contracts:
Amendment: two original signature copies are required, one for service provider and the other for Construction Administrator files. Once returned by service provider with its signature, route agreement for signature by fiscal administrator and the appropriate approving authority.
General Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest: No public official at any level of state or local government shall make, participate in making or in any way attempt to use her/his official position to influence a governmental decision in which s/he knows or has reason to know s/he has a financial interest. "Public officials" include state employees and consultants.
A public official has a financial interest in a decision if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the official, a member of his or her immediate family or on any of the following:
For purposes of this section, indirect investment or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of a public official, by an agent on behalf of a public official, or by a business entity or trust in which the official, the official's agents, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10% interest or greater (Gov. Code section 87103).
CSU Conflict of Interest Code: Employees designated in the CSU Conflict of Interest Code must disqualify themselves from making or participating in making a decision that foreseeably would have a material effect on any personal financial interest (Gov. Code section 87300 et seq.; California Code of Regulations, Title 2 section 18730). Consultation with Office of General Counsel is advised.
The following six sections are detailed at length in the Law of Design & Construction Training Manual-December, 2017, Section XX:
Forms & Templates: